Posted on

Wino seeds

Grape Seed Extracts Reduce Formaldehyde Levels in Leather Production

I’ve covered the topic of the recycling of wine industry a lot lately on The Academic Wino, as it is it becoming increasing more desired in the wine business to not only decrease the contaminants and potentially toxic chemicals in the environment, but to also increase the overall sustainability of the industry as a whole. Everywhere I look there are more and more papers on the topic, and even though they vary widely in their potential applications, they all boil down to the same thing: environmental friendliness and sustainable practices. In the European Union, there is approximately 14.5 million tons of wine industry

Photo by davity dave: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/33/Pomace_in_the_vineyard_after_pressing.jpg/800px-Pomace_in_the_vineyard_after_pressing.jpg

waste produced from wineries within its borders, which is a lot of material that could be recycled and reused for other purposes.

Most of you are aware by now that wine industry waste contains primarily crushed grape skins, seeds, and pulp. You also may know already that these winemaking by-products are rich in beneficial polyphenol compounds that act as antioxidants, antibacterial agents, anticarcinogenic agents, antiviral agents, et cetera. We’ve seen research that focuses on using wine industry wastes as supplements to one’s diet; for use as supplements to the winemaking process in order to improve wine quality; for adding to processed meats to reduce carcinogenic properties; and for coming with animal manure to produce an alternative fuel source, just to name a few.

Today’s paper focuses on yet another application for wine industry waste: as a treatment in leather production to reduce toxic by-products often associated with the process. Now, I understand that leather production in and of itself is a hot topic amongst many animal rights proponents, however, I’ll ask you to bear with me and not go down that road for now. I am not taking any stance in this post on the use of leather for the purpose of clothing or other products, however, since this is a common practice around the world, it is important to find more “environmentally and health friendly” ways to produce it, regardless of whether or not you agree to the practice to begin with. That issue is a whole other discussion which is not appropriate for this type of blog.

Back to the topic at hand…

One of the by-products of leather production is formaldehyde, which at certain levels can be very unpleasant to the nostrils, as well as toxic to both humans and the environments. Something that is used in preserving dead creatures for

Photo source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/57/Formaldehyde-2D.svg/634px-Formaldehyde-2D.svg.png

science labs isn’t exactly something I would want to be in contact with for extended periods of time. Formaldehyde is not actually used in the production of leather; however, compounds in the leather itself can react with other production agents (i.e. synthetic tanning agents, resins, etc) and produce free formaldehyde in the air around it. This free formaldehyde can cause an array of health problems, and is known to illicit allergic responses in some individuals.

Many countries throughout the world have placed limits on the allowable levels of formaldehyde. The European Union classifies formaldehyde as a Category 3 suspected carcinogen, with allowable levels of formaldehyde in clothes which are not in direct contact with the skin no greater than 300ppm (parts per million). Levels of formaldehyde in clothes which are not in direct contact with the skin are very similar in New Zealand, and are even lower for children and those with sensitive skin. Allowable levels of formaldehyde in the United States vary depending upon the context. For example, OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) permissible exposure limits in air are 0.75ppm, short term exposure limits (over 15 minutes) are 2ppm, and action levels (over an 8 hour period) are 0.5ppm. It is in the best interest of those working in the leather production industry, and ultimately those that are exposed to the leather once it is finished, that ways to reduce free formaldehyde in the air is of critical importance.

See also  Best light for cannabis seeds

In a previous study performed by the authors of the current study, they found that by using Camellia sinensis and Vinca rosea, the leaves and flowers of which are utilized to make tea and therapeutic compounds, respectively, were effective in reducing the levels of free formaldehyde in leather production. The common compounds between the two, which were likely involved in the reduction of formaldehyde levels were the tannins; as well as the polyphenolic compound catechin (part of the flavanol family) and gallic acid components.

Building upon these findings, the authors then examined grape seed extracts, which were produced from wine industry waste. Grape seeds contain many of the same polyphenolic compounds as the species studied previously, and also include proanthocyanidin molecules which are also part of the flavanol family. Would grape seeds also act to decrease levels of free formaldehyde in leather production as tea had? The paper presented today aimed to examine that very question.

Vitis vinifera wine grape seeds were utilized in this study, and did not include other portions of the industry waste (such as skins or pulp). Seeds were ground and then prepared by three different methods: 1) as a powder; 2) as an extract; and 3) as an extract using a modified procedure (details omitted by cited in an unpublished document).

The source of the leather was domestic wet salted sheep skins.

Leather was produced using approved methods and was treated with each of the three grape seed treatments plus a non-grape seed control.

Experiments were repeated 3 times.

  • Modified grape seed extract treatment resulted in leather with the lowest levels of free formaldehyde.
    • All three grape seed treatments (powder, plus two different extracts) reduced the levels of free formaldehyde compared to the control.
    • Even though the grape seed powder was effective, it did not completely dissolve in water.
      • This created powder residues on the leather which is likely visually unappealing to consumers.
      • Extracts did completely dissolve in water, thereby would be more desirable in leather production than the powder.

      This was a short and sweet study, which tested the effectiveness of grape seed powder and extracts on the levels of free formaldehyde in leather production. According to the results, all treatments made from grape seeds were effective in reducing the levels of free formaldehyde in leather production, though modified grape seed extracts were the most effective. Even though grape seed powder was effective in reducing the levels of formaldehyde, it is not an ideal product to use in leather production, since the powder did not fully dissolve in water and thereby left a powdery residue on the finished leathers’ surface.

      In their concluding statements, the authors suggested that the amount of grape seed extract used in leather production could be increased or decreased in order to further control the levels of free formaldehyde by-products. Specifically,

      Photo by kanthalion: http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5292/5418747419_290a8f2963.jpg

      increasing the amount of grape seed extract in the leather production should further decrease the levels of free formaldehyde produced. This statement was not supplemented with experimental evidence, thus must be taken with a grain of salt. In theory, the prediction is plausible; however, one should not be so confident that it is correct without experimental evidence. This would make a good follow-up experiment to the experiment presented above.

      I would be curious to see how extracts made from complete grape marc (i.e. seeds, skins, and pulp) performed in the same experiment. This may be a more realistic approach, as the seeds would not have to be separated from the marc prior to creating the extracts.

      Another follow-up experiment could involve different types of leather. Are these extracts as effective with other types of leather? Could these extracts be utilized in the production of synthetic leathers somehow?

      In general, this study provided yet another interesting use of wine industry wastes, though certainly more work needs to be done to further optimize the process.

      What do you all think of this study or this topic in general? Please feel free to leave your comments!

      Bayramoğlu, E.E. 2013. Hidden treasure of nature: PAs. The effects of grape seeds on free formaldehyde of leather. Industrial Crops and Products 41: 53-56.

      White Wines with a Different “Dimension”

      Mauro Cirilli is the wine director of Perbacco ristorante + bar and the newly opened barbacco eno trattoria. While living in Italy, Mauro attended the three-year Italian Sommelier Association Program and worked as sommelier at the celebrated il Cibreo. He went on to work as assistant sommelier at the renowned La Rivista in the Hotel Ca’ Pisani in Venice, as well as five-star hotels, including Hotel Baglioni and Hotel Danieli. Mauro moved to San Francisco in 2001, and became the lead sommelier at Aqua. In 2006, Perbacco opened with Mauro as the wine director, garnering a number of national wine awards. With the Perbacco team, Mauro opened barbacco eno trattoria in 2010, and continues to oversee both wine programs.

      White Wines with a Different “Dimension”

      You may be thinking, “What is this all about?”

      You may already know that white wines are made slightly differently from red wines. While with red wines the skin and seeds are kept in contact with the juice during the fermentation for a period of time to allow extraction of color and tannins, with white wines usually the skins and seeds are removed immediately before fermenting.

      In the last fifteen to twenty years, things have changed. A few producers from Italy, mostly from the northeast regions, have been experimenting with a very old and almost forgotten technique of longer skin maceration for white wines. While in the last century, the market required a more pristine and clean style of whites, which commands more manipulation; these winemakers are going back to how wine used to be made thousands of years ago, when technology did not exist and the product was more natural.

      Why are they doing that?

      Contact with the grape skins extracts not only color and tannins, but also minerals that bring to the actual wine a different “dimension.” It is best to say that these wine producers are very strong believers in natural winemaking, where wine must represent the unique terroir of the vineyards.

      To describe these non-conventional wines, wine journalists around the country started using the term “orange wines,” referring to the color that can vary from a dark yellow-orange to dark-golden brown. For me, the most exciting thing is not the color, but the dimensions of these wines; I’m referring to their texture, mouthfeel, and depth.

      This style of white wine is denser and richer, with good weight on your palate. The presence of tannins and minerals add more complexity and a full flavor profile. They have unique aromas that can vary from apple or pear cider to warm spices, from baked fruit to earthy notes. Because of their texture and depth, these wines are very food friendly. They are definitely different compared to many other everyday whites available in the mainstream market.

      I grew up in the Veneto region of Italy, where a few producers are following this ancient winemaking method. Here are two most notable ones:

      Angiolino Maule, from the town of Gambellara, 25 miles east of Verona, makes one of my favorite whites, Sassaia, which is made with Garganega and Trebbiano grapes. He believes strongly in organic viticulture, where the use of chemicals is totally avoided in the vineyard in order to protect all the micro-organisms present in the soil. The vine roots are therefore able to extract important minerals from the volcanic soil of the vineyards.

      After harvest, he macerates the grapes with skins and seeds for 24 hours, and then begins fermenting without using any added yeast except the indigenous one present in the grape. The wine is then aged in large barrels for almost 10 months before it is bottled without any filtration.

      Sassaia is so different from any other white wines produced using Garganega and Trebbiano: the color is lightly orange, with aromas of apple cider, orange peel, honey, and nuts; and its texture is quite remarkable, with the presence of light tannins and great minerality.

      Alessandro Sgaravatti is the owner Castello di Lispida, located in the same town where I was born, Monselice, just 15 miles south of Padova. Sgaravatti is a disciple of Josko Gravner, the pioneer who revived this old method of vinification. (Gravner, during a trip to Georgia in the former Soviet Union, mastered an ancient winemaking technique that dates back five thousand years, where grapes are placed in large clay amphorae, buried in the soil, and left to ferment in contact with skins and seeds for a very long time.)

      Sgaravatti makes a wine named Anfora, using Friulano grapes (previously know as Tocai Friulano) following the technique he learned from Gravner. He puts the grapes in the amphorae so that their juice goes through maceration and fermentation in contact with skins. After six months, the skins are removed and the wine is left to age eight more months.

      During this process there is no use of any temperature control, no addition of sulfites, and no filtration. This wine has a dark cloudy orange color, with lots of earthy aromas, warm spices, and resins. The texture is bold, very dense and thick, with tannins and minerals present in good quantity…a wine that truly comes from the soil!

      Sgaravatti believes that wine is a natural product and has to be treated in a natural way. He once explained to me his philosophy behind the use of amphorae: “Grapes take nutrients from the soil through their plant. When we put them into an amphora made of clay, we bring them to their natural origin. During the fermentation, the grapes exchange energy with the soil, so the amphora works as a natural link between the two elements.”

      Maule and Sgaravatti are just two examples of producers that are going back to the old, traditional winemaking technique that unfortunately had almost been forgotten. It is going back to our original roots; the connection between the man, the vine, and the soil.

      See also  Organic cannabis seed breeders